I'll put ya oot for a fookin' week!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
The entire thing is so confusing to me.
Look, The only side of the story we have to go off of is G-Dog and Rye Guys version. And even in their version of the story, They openly admit that they were taunting the guy and calling him "John Goodman" and making fun of how poor he is. What do you expect to happen when you meet someone for the first time (assuming that this is the first time john goodman met rye guy) and he compares you to a decades-long fat ass while you're all drinking?
And look, I get it. It's G-dogs house. But don't start nothing, Won't be nothing. Just because Rye Guy won the fight doesn't mean that he wasn't the instigating cunt in the matter.
Just don't invite people over to your house and compare them to John Goodman while calling their home a "hovel" while drinking and be all cunty-surprised when you get punched. And just so we're clear, There was no gun present in this encounter. No matter how drunk the guy was, he didn't pull a gun, He at least had the balls to fight like a man, even if he lost.
Sorry, G-dog and Rye Guy were at fault here.
You admit we only got one side of the story, but you're also sure "G-dog and Rye Guy were at fault here"
How does that work?